Somaliland's National Intelligence: A Threat to Human Rights and Security

By -

 

In this article, we will explore the concerns surrounding Somaliland's National Intelligence Agency. Despite being a non-law enforcement agency, it operates detention centers, which is illegal and poses a threat to human rights and national security. Additionally, we will discuss how the agency's focus on limiting freedom of speech hampers its ability to fulfill its responsibilities.


The National Intelligence Agency (NIA) is a critical entity responsible for safeguarding Somaliland's national security. It plays a crucial role in gathering intelligence, counterintelligence, and protecting the country's interests both domestically and internationally.

The agency was established with the purpose of safeguarding national security and collecting intelligence information, operating independently from the police. Its primary focus is to ensure the safety and welfare of the citizens of Somaliland. Its primary responsibility is to collect and analyze intelligence to support national security objectives. To ensure efficient operations, it is crucial that the agency operates strictly within its jurisdiction as defined by the National Intelligence Agency Act. 59/2012.

The agency is responsible for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating intelligence information to relevant authorities. This includes monitoring potential threats, counterterrorism efforts, and supporting the country's overall security framework. However, the agency is not authorized to engage in law enforcement activities, such as detaining individuals. This important distinction ensures the protection of human rights and prevents the misuse of power.

Somaliland's National Intelligence Agency, though not a law enforcement body, has been operating detention centers in violation of its own laws. This raises serious concerns about human rights and undermines the nation's security. It is essential to address these issues and ensure the agency operates within legal boundaries.

The operation of detention centers by Somaliland's National Intelligence Agency is a flagrant violation of its own mandate. These centers undermine human rights, as detainees may be held without the necessary legal protections, raising concerns about mistreatment and abuse.

The head of the NIA currently holds the title of "Commander." However, this title fails to reflect the agency's true nature as an intelligence organization. The agency's primary responsibility is to ensure national security, which involves assessing potential threats, gathering intelligence, and collaborating with relevant stakeholders. However, its efforts seem disproportionately concentrated on curbing freedom of speech.

It is worrisome that the agency seems preoccupied with curbing freedom of speech instead of fulfilling its core responsibilities. This undermines democratic values and stifles the open dialogue necessary for societal growth. The agency's actions create a chilling effect on public discourse, discouraging citizens from expressing their opinions freely. This hampers active participation, opportunities for constructive criticism, and ultimately hinders progress.

The NIA's leadership position should be restructured to align with international standards and best practices in intelligence agencies worldwide. Appointing a Director General with a university degree in intelligence or related fields can enhance the agency's capabilities and professionalism. The agency should work collaboratively with other institutions and communities to strengthen national security efforts. By neglecting this important responsibility, it prevents the effective utilization of resources and expertise for the overall benefit of Somaliland.

The NIA's role in safeguarding the national security of Somaliland is of utmost importance. By undertaking the necessary steps to restructure the agency's leadership position and ensuring it operates within its jurisdiction, the government can strengthen the intelligence community and protect the country's interests. The president should provide strategic guidance to the agency, aligning its objectives with the overall national security strategy. He must ensure that it operates within the boundaries defined by its enabling legislation and should provide oversight and hold the agency accountable for its actions and decisions.

Addressing the concerns regarding Somaliland's National Intelligence Agency is crucial for upholding human rights and maintaining national security. By ensuring the agency operates within the confines of the law and focuses on its core responsibilities, we can strive towards a stronger, more inclusive society.

 

Yousef Timacade is a lawyer, legal analyst, and commentator with over a decade of experience in program management, research, and human rights advocacy. He holds master’s degrees in both law and executive management, which have equipped him with a unique blend of legal expertise and leadership acumen. Throughout his career, he has worked with numerous national and international non-governmental organizations, driving impactful initiatives in the areas of human rights, policy development, and social justice. Currently, Yousef serves as the Country Coordinator for Somalia and Somaliland at SIHA Network, where he leads efforts to advance women's rights and advocate for marginalized communities.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shattering Myths: Confronting the Cultural and Religious Misconceptions that Sustain FGM

By -
Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) remains deep-rooted in certain cultures, particularly in Somali regions, despite global human rights efforts to eradicate it. One of the most persistent arguments used to justify FGM is the claim that it is a religious obligation. However, this justification is rooted more in cultural misconceptions than in religious doctrine. Another complex factor is the belief that men, including fathers, should not interfere in what is considered a "woman's affair," such as decisions about FGM for their daughters. These dynamics present significant challenges to efforts aimed at protecting girls from this harmful practice. The belief that FGM is a religious requirement, particularly within Islamic communities, is widespread but incorrect. Many argue that FGM, particularly the Sunna cut is mandated by Islam. The term "Sunna" refers to the practices of the Prophet Muhammad, leading to the misconception that this form of FGM is a religious obli...
Read more

Building Solidarity for New Horizons: Making a Case for the Maputo Protocol in Somalia

By -
  The Maputo Protocol stands as one of Africa's most progressive and comprehensive legal instruments, designed to protect and promote the rights of women across the continent. Officially titled the "Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa," it was adopted in Maputo, Mozambique, in July 2003. Its 32 articles cover a broad range of women's rights issues, including political participation, reproductive health, protection from harmful practices, and sexual violence. However, despite signing the Maputo Protocol in 2006, Somalia has yet to ratify it, delaying the country's ability to fully protect women and girls under its provisions. This article makes a case for the ratification and implementation of the Maputo Protocol in Somalia, with a focus on critical areas such as female genital mutilation (FGM), women's participation, and sexual offenses. Somalia’s commitment to ratifying this protocol is vital for...
Read more

Somaliland's Healthcare Crisis: Profiteering Plagues a Struggling System, Driving Up Costs and Eroding Efficiency

By -
“ He gave me medicine, and when I poured it into her eyes, both of them fell out” .   A  mother says while holding her blind daughter's shoulder during a debate on MM TV. The provision of healthcare in Somaliland stands at a critical juncture, where the ease of establishing clinics and pharmacies has led to a concerning laxity in ensuring the quality and safety of medicines. The repercussions of this oversight have tragically affected individuals like Asma, a young girl left blind due to the callousness of an unscrupulous clinic owner. The privatization of healthcare services, while aiming for accessibility, has resulted in an unchecked influx of substandard medications. The blatant admission by certain suppliers that quality medicines remain financially out of reach for many only compounds the issue, causing widespread health hazards. These falsified and inadequate drugs contribute to dire consequences: poisoning, untreated diseases, premature deaths, and therapeutic failures...
Read more

Somalia's Potential within the East African Community: Assessing the Benefits and Challenges

By -
 The East African Community (EAC) stands as a beacon of regional cooperation and economic integration, fostering collaboration among member states for shared growth and development. As Somalia navigates its path to stability and progress, the question arises: Can Somalia obtain mutual benefits by joining or deepening its engagement with the EAC? Somalia, a nation with a complex history of conflict and instability, has been on a trajectory towards stability and reconstruction in recent years. Its potential inclusion within the EAC carries both promises and challenges, presenting a dynamic landscape of opportunities and considerations. Joining the EAC could potentially unlock various economic opportunities for Somalia. Access to a larger market comprising Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, and Burundi would provide a platform for Somali goods and services to reach a wider consumer base. Increased trade facilitation and reduction in tariff barriers could spur economic growth and enh...
Read more

The Cruelty of Hargeisa's Municipal Government

By -
Mayor Abdilkarim Mooge, known for his penchant for self-promotion, hastily issued a statement late last night, attempting to distance himself from the tragic incident. However, in his rush to absolve himself of responsibility, he conveniently overlooks the fact that he often basks himself in the credit for the positive actions of his staff. This selective disavowal risks painting him as politically opportunistic, exploiting situations for personal gain while evading accountability for the actions of his administration. Such actions undermine the trust and credibility he seeks to maintain with the public, as they see through the facade of empty statements devoid of genuine empathy or commitment to justice
Read more